Skip to main content

Posts

Communist ideology is a very dangerous for our nation development & people life

Communist ideology is a very dangerous for our nation development & people life  Communists failed in India because of the faulty policies of the party itself. Even when they had tall leaders like EMS Nanboidaripad, AK Gopalan, Jyothy Basu, Harikrishna Surjit Singh, etc., party could not expand beyond West Bengal and Kerala . Communists are more affiliated to dogmas or ideologies of Lenin, Stalin or Mao. None of those suit our culture and civilisation. Moreover the leftists started copying Russia and China instead of developing their own philosophy suited to our land. Communists developed trade union movements in Kerala as well as in other major cities. In Kerala they were successful in organizing the same. But the state suffered and no industries could flourish. Also no ,private entrepreneurs are ready to set up shop in Kerala. The trade unions in Bangalore run amock bringing down many factories. Bangalore was home to many textile Mills including Binny Mill, which had to
Recent posts
Che was a murderer, fanatic and a terrorist; there is nothing honorable, decent or admirable about his sordid life,  Then why do you see naive 'far-leftists" wearing Che t-shirts and hanging his poster, as if he was a hero?  The communist and socialist influences in the democratic party are alive and well, in Hollywood, they want you to think Che was a hero. If Hitler had been a communist, Hollywood would have given him a pass for murdering innocent people. Make no mistake, Che Guevara was a murderer and terrorist!  Castro had him execute people that opposed their politics, later Castro turned on him but Castro racked up 16,000+ murders, 100,000 imprisonments and 30,000 deaths of people trying to escape Castro's oppression.  The liberal media wants to sanitize Castro and Guevara; Hollywood is churning out "Michael Moore type" movies, to cover up the true horror that these cold blooded killers have done.  Wondering if Che is a socialist or a communist i

Che Guevara was an International Terrorist & Mass Murderer

Che Guevara was an international terrorist and mass murderer. During his vicious campaigns to impose communism on countries throughout Latin America, che Guevara trained and motivated the Castro regime’s firing squads that executed thousands of men, women and children. This poster reveals the truth of this criminal’s cruel, murderous hypocrisy and acknowledges his countless victims, known and unknown. All individuals used in this photo montage were murdered by him THE REAL CHE GUEVARA “Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!”  “Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded kill

Facts: How Communist betrayed India ?

Facts: How Communist betrayed India ? Communist party of India and their spokespersons always claims in media that they are nationalists and they too love India but their actions are showing a different picture. If we check their history than we can found that they have supported each and every separatist movement in India. Their student wings are supporting the separatist movements in North east, Kashmir, Bengal, Kerela, Nagaland, Manipur Khalistan etc. Most recent examples of this separatism politics were the incidents happened in JNU and Jadhavpur universities. In JNU their student wings shouted the slogans like “Bharat tere tukde honge Insha allah Insha allah” against India[i] and in Jadhavpur University, a group of students were seen calling for ‘freedom’ for Kashmir, Nagaland and Manipur on the campus premises. “Hum kya chahe – Azadi. Kashmir ki Azadi. Manipur ki Azadi. Nagaland ki Azadi (We demand freedom. Kashmir’s freedom. Manipur’s freedom. Nagaland’s freedom),” one

Why is Karl Marx against capitalism ?

Why is Karl Marx against capitalism?  Osho said    he is a poor Jew and is full of jealousy against those who are rich.    That is a Jewish trend, very characteristic. In India I was surprised -- because I was looking for a parallel. Jainas are the Jews in India as far as riches are concerned. You cannot find a single Jaina beggar. The Jainas are super-rich, or upper middle class; at the worst, middle class. Once in a while you will find a poor Jaina -- not a beggar, but poor. These poor Jainas were the first to be attracted to communism.   I was surprised to find this fact. One of my far away relatives is a very famous communist leader, Comrade Bhagchand. I asked him, "Have you considered the fact that it is not that you want to destroy capitalism, it is simply that you are a poor Jaina and you have so much jealousy in you against the rich Jainas?" But man is so clever in making philosophies of things. Three generations in Marx's family had been poor. He hi

Can you explain why are you against communism? And can we learn something from the demise of this ideology ?

Can you explain why are you against communism? And can we learn something from the demise of this ideology? Osho said    I am against communism, The word communism is derived from "commune"; but communism is not commune-ism. It has no base in the idea of the commune -- on the contrary, it is simply anti-capitalism. Its name gives you the false notion of something positive, but in fact it is only a negative approach: it is anti-capitalism. And my understanding is that anything that is basically negative cannot help man's evolution in any way. It is because of this fact that atheism has not been of any help to man's evolution, his consciousness, his growth. It is just pure negativity. Just saying that there is no God, and basing your whole philosophy on the belief in no -- God, is sheer stupidity. Life needs something positive. In fact it needs something so positive that it can absorb its negative also, so powerfully positive that the negative need not r